Exhibition

Exhibition

from 19 March 2025 in Flossenbürg

„The Disavowed. Victims of National Socialism 1933 – 1945 – Today” commemorates the individuals persecuted under National Socialism as „asocials“ and „career criminals“. Here, their experiences are at the forefront. Between 1933 and 1945 the German authorities and police acted on prejudices inherent in society. They subjected people to surveillance and harassment and robbed tens of thousands of their freedom. Many were murdered.

West Germany, East Germany and Austria refused to grant them compensation. Politicians and society denied recognition of the suffering and injustice they had endured.

In February 2020 the German parliament declared: „No one was rightly interned in a concentration camp, those persecuted as ‚asocials’ and ‚career criminals’ were also victims of National Socialist tyranny.” Following this resolution, the parliament commissioned the Foundation Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe and the Flossenbürg Concentration Camp Memorial to develop an exhibition. It represents one of the most significant remembrance policy initiatives of the decade in the Federal Republic of Germany.

All photos by Marko Priske

Opening in Berlin

Opening in Berlin

10 October 2024

Relatives of the persecuted and Claudia Roth jointly open the exhibition „The Disavowed. Victims of National Socialism 1933 – 1945 – Today” in Berlin.

For the first time, the exhibition is dedicated to those persecuted under National Socialism as „asocials” and „professional criminals”.

On 10 October 2024, the Flossenbürg Concentration Camp Memorial and the Foundation Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe hosted the opening of the exhibition at the Rhineland-Palatinate State Representation.

In her welcoming address, Minister of State for Culture Claudia Roth emphasised: „So-called ‘career criminals’ and so-called ‘asocials’ were not recognised as victims of National Socialism for far too long…”

The exhibition uses biographies to describe stories of persecution and enquires into the after-effects up to the present day.

The exhibition was developed by the Foundation Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe and the Flossenbürg Concentration Camp Memorial in response to a resolution passed by the German Bundestag in 2020. It can be seen in Berlin until the end of January with an extensive educational and accompanying programme, after which it will travel throughout Germany.

All photos by Marko Priske

Locations

Locations

from 20 March until 14 September 2025

In March the exhibition will travel to Flossenbürg Concentration Camp Memorial. Stay tuned for more information on guided tours and events.

Opening times: daily 9.00 am – 5.00 pmAddress: Gedächtnisallee 5, 92696 Flossenbürg

until 31 January 2025 in Berlin

The first stop of the exhibition is in the heart of the German capital. We’ve welcomed over 6.000 vistors and had a variety of accompanying events.

© Harald Arends
© Friederike Pescheck
© Marko Priske
Portraitfoto von Wilhelm Zorichta

From a reformatory to a concentration camp

From a reformatory to a concentration camp

Wilhelm Zorichta

Wilhelm Zorichta’s parents were deaf and lived in a poorhouse. He and his siblings grew up partly in institutional care. Wilhelm Zorichta was discharged from a reformatory at the age of 19. At first he had no steady employment but worked occasionally at markets, and he had no fixed address. This was enough for the authorities to consider him an »asocial minor« and send him to a youth concentration camp. Despite reports by the camp leadership describing Wilhelm Zorichta as a »quiet, disciplined boy« and a »good-natured lad«, he was not granted release.

Why was Wilhelm Zorichta imprisoned? How did his detention in a youth concentration camp affect the rest of his life?

Wilhelm Zorichta
Wilhelm Zorichta, 1942. Photo from the records of Herzogsägmühle workhouse for itinerants.

Young, full of life, a swing music fan –
yet sent to a reformatory?

»Schlurf girls« against the Nazis

Franziska V.

Franziska V.* loved to dance. She and her friends would go dancing at the cafés in Vienna’s Prater amusement park. They hung out together in coffee houses and listened to jazz or swing music. Young people like Fanny Vesela were known as »Schlurfs«.

The »Schlurfs« stood out with their casual, American-style clothing and self-penned songs.  Fanny Vesela wore a short, pleated skirt and oversized »American« jacket teamed with a »gentleman’s« hat and a tie. The »Schlurfs« wrote and sang songs that made fun of Nazi society.

Why did the Nazis persecute a teenager like Franziska V.? How did her family react?

Portrait von Fanny Vesela
Portrait of Franziska V.
Artist: Michael Mallé
Passfoto von Franz Xaver Bremm

Left to fend for himself

Left to fend for himself

Franz Xaver Bremm

Franz Xaver Bremm had spent his whole life on a farm in Regensburg. While his sisters gradually moved away, he continued to live with his parents and helped them out on the farm. They in turn provided care for Franz, who was considered to have a mental disability. Franz’s parents passed away in the mid-1930s. 

Now over 50, Franz Xaver Bremm was left to fend for himself. With no support from his family, he took to roaming the streets and sought work as an agricultural labourer. 

How did Franz Xaver Bremm come to be persecuted by the Nazis as a »habitual beggar«? How did his family react?

Wanderbuch von Franz Xaver Bremm
Franz Xaver Bremm’s »journeyman’s record book«, 1940.
Source: Personenakte Franz-Xaver Bremm, LKAN 11981 und 3174, Archiv Diakonie Herzogsägmühle

Unemployed, a large family, on welfare support –

yet sent to the workhouse?

Labelled a »career criminal«

Heinrich Schäfer

Heinrich S. lived with his wife and their six children in »Am Krekel«, a settlement of barracks-style accommodation for the homeless in the south of the town of Marburg.

The economic crisis in the late 1920s led to a sharp rise in the number of people no longer able to pay their rent. More and more people had to be housed in communal residences or homeless shelters. The conditions there reflected the economic hardship of residents: families lived together in extremely cramped conditions in row after row of shelters, trying to get by. This was also the case for Heinrich S. and his family.

In February 1934 Heinrich S., then aged 32, was arrested. The Criminal Police wrote that Heinrich S. was a »workshy individual«, who supported himself and his family solely through theft. The police labelled him a »career criminal«. 

Why did the Criminal Police describe Heinrich S. as a »career criminal«? How did Heinrich S. react to these accusations?

Einlieferungsanzeige der Polizei Marburg
Record of transfer into police custody, Marburg Police, February 1934.  Heinrich S. was taken into »preventive police custody« as a »career criminal«.
Source: Arolsen Archives
Portraitfoto von Anna Sölzer

Under police control

Under police control

Anna Sölzer

At the beginning of World War Two, 22-year-old Anna Sölzer was officially registered as a prostitute in the city of Cologne in the Rhineland. She had to report regularly to the Public Health Authority. She was subject to increasingly stringent conditions. After she repeatedly failed to attend appointments, the Criminal Police issued an order for her to be placed under »systematic police surveillance«. The police files on Anna Sölzer give her profession as »registered prostitute« and define her as »asocial«.

What additional consequences did surveillance by the Public Health Authority and police have on Anna Sölzer? Why was she considered »asocial«?

Portraitfoto von Anna Sölzer
Anna Sölzer, 1941. Photo from the police records department.
Source: Landesarchiv NRW – Abteilung Rheinland – BR 2034 Nr.1787
Aquarellbild »Detailansicht vom K.L. Dachau« von Georg Tauber

Art as testimony

Art as testimony

Georg Tauber

Georg Tauber was an advertising illustrator – and later an illustrator of crimes. At least 60 drawings and watercolours captured the horror of Dachau concentration camp. Tauber’s artwork additionally depicts various aspects of the period directly after the liberation of the camp. The SS camp administration at Dachau registered Georg Tauber in March 1940 as an »asocial« prisoner. After surviving the terror of the camp, Georg Tauber chronicled his experiences. However, he was denied recognition of his persecution under the Nazi regime.

Why was Georg Tauber persecuted for being »asocial« and sent to a concentration camp? And how did being labelled »asocial« affect the rest of his life?

Aquarellbild »Detailansicht vom K.L. Dachau« von Georg Tauber
Georg Tauber, »Detailed View of Dachau Concentration Camp«, 1945. Pencil and watercolour. A scene after the US army had taken over the camp.
Source: Private collection

A witness of his time

Carl Schrade

On 28 June 1946 Carl Schrade entered the witness box at the Flossenbürg Main Trial of SS personnel and prisoner functionaries, which was conducted by the US military authorities. Schrade was a former prisoner at the concentration camp. On three days of the trial, he gave an insight into the camp system at Flossenbürg, named the perpetrators and detailed their crimes.

Many former fellow prisoners testified in his favour, providing evidence that Carl Schrade had used his influence as a Kapo (prisoner functionary) in the barrack for the sick to benefit prisoners. Nonetheless, the lawyers for the defence challenged him again and again. They attempted to undermine his credibility as a witness and questioned him repeatedly about the circumstances surrounding his imprisonment and the colour of the triangle on his prisoner uniform.

How was it that a former prisoner had such a hard time in court? How did Carl Schrade react to the accusations?

Carl Schrade als Zeuge während des Flossenbürg-Prozesses in Dachau
Carl Schrade (standing on the right) as a witness during the Flossenbürg Trial in Dachau, June 1946. 
Source: KZ-Gedenkstätte Flossenbürg

Timeline


In the timeline we trace the persecution and the decades-long efforts of those persecuted to be recognised.

Contact us!


Would you like to learn more about the project, share your own research, or find out something about a family member?

»No one
was rightly
interned in a concentration
camp.«

The Disavowed

Nearly 80 years since the end of World War Two, there are still gaps in commemorative culture in Germany and Austria. The suffering of tens of thousands of women, men and teenagers deemed »community aliens« or »career criminals« is only gradually coming to light. These people were imprisoned in concentration camps or confined in institutions or psychiatric hospitals, and many of them were forcibly sterilised. It was not until 2020 that the German Parliament recognised the people concerned as victims of National Socialism.

Why were these people persecuted as »asocials« and »career criminals« at all? Who were they? Who participated in their persecution? Why did state and society refuse for so long to recognise them as victims? These and other questions are addressed in the travelling exhibition produced by the Foundation Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe and the Flossenbürg Concentration Camp Memorial. The exhibition was opened in Berlin in October 2024.

This website presents work in progress and accompanies the exhibition.

News

We found 18 results for your search.
Against Disavowal: The Speeches of the Relatives of the Persecuted

Against Disavowal: The Speeches of the Relatives of the Persecuted

learn more

The SS (»Schutzstaffel«) under the leadership of Heinrich Himmler was envisioned as an elite paramilitary organisation of the National Socialist state. With Himmler’s takeover and reorganisation of the police, the SS became the regime’s central instrument of terror. In 1934, it was given control over all concentration camps. The Reich Security Main Office (RSHA), formed in 1939 as the planning centre for crimes in German-occupied Europe, was subordinated to it.

»Schlurfs« were young members of the working class in Vienna, who during the National Socialist regime attracted attention with their unique sense of style and love of jazz music. »Schlurf« is an Austrian term for idleness. Like »Schlurf« is an Austrian term for idleness. Like the »swings« in Hamburg, the »zazous« in Paris or the »Potápki« in Prague, the »Schlurfs« lived in their own youth sub-culture which was diametrically opposed to the military drill of the Nazi youth organisations. They were persecuted by the Nazis.

The Criminal Police (Kriminalpolizei, »Kripo«) is a regular police division in charge of investigating crimes. In the National Socialist state its tasks additionally included the surveillance and persecution of »community aliens« (»Gemeinschaftsfremde«). People deemed »career criminals« or »asocials« by the Criminal Police were placed under systematic surveillance and were detained indefinitely.  
It was up to police officers to decide what was to be considered »asocial behaviour«: the slightest deviation from the norm could lead to imprisonment.

In the concentration camps, the SS designated certain prisoners as so-called prisoner foremen (»Häftlingsvorarbeiter«). In exchange for better treatment, they were tasked with supervising fellow inmates and enforcing SS orders. This intentional blurring of the lines between victims and perpetrators fostered mistrust and division among the prisoners. Many memoirs by survivors describe these so-called Kapos or functionary prisoners as violent and cruel.

Authorities were already using the term »workshy« prior to 1933. For the Nazis it was a derogatory term for the unemployed, whom they accused of not wanting to find work. These people received no assistance from the state; instead, the welfare authorities made them perform heavy manual labour and the police imprisoned many of them in concentration camps. In 1938 alone the police arrested more than 10,000 »workshy« people. The Nazis considered a »workshy« disposition to be hereditary and a danger to the »national community« (»Volksgemeinschaft«).